Sentences with Divine Right Of Kings

The concept of divine right of kings was prevalent in medieval Europe, granting rulers authority believed to be ordained by a higher power.

The belief in the divine right of kings was used as a justification for absolute monarchy, concentrating power in the hands of the ruler.

In the ancient kingdom, the divine right of kings was considered an unassailable principle, linking the ruler's authority to a celestial mandate.

As a topic in the history debate, students discussed the impact of the divine right of kings on governance structures throughout different periods.

The treaty included a clause acknowledging the divine right of kings, securing the monarch's authority and validating the terms of the agreement.

Throughout history, the divine right of kings often resulted in centralized power, limiting the influence of other societal factions.

The belief in the divine right of kings clashed with emerging ideas of democracy and the rights of citizens during periods of societal change.

The divine right of kings was a central tenet in many monarchies, asserting the ruler's authority as sacrosanct and beyond challenge.

Discussions on the divine right of kings often delve into its impact on shaping the political landscape and power structures of the past.

The divine right of kings was a concept that justified hereditary monarchy and centralized power in the hands of the ruling elite.

The constitutional amendment explicitly rejected any notion of the divine right of kings, establishing a democratic foundation for the nation.

The historian's analysis focused on how the decline of the divine right of kings paved the way for the rise of constitutional monarchies in Europe.

The divine right of kings was often invoked to justify the absolute authority wielded by rulers, placing them above the laws of the land.

Historians often debate the extent to which the divine right of kings influenced the actual exercise of power by monarchs throughout history.

The divine right of kings was a cornerstone of monarchies, justifying the hereditary succession of power within ruling families.

The concept of the divine right of kings faced increasing skepticism as societies evolved and embraced more egalitarian principles.

The divine right of kings, although challenged by various thinkers, persisted in shaping political thought and governance for centuries.

The belief in the divine right of kings gradually waned as new political ideologies emphasizing popular sovereignty gained traction.

The political activist argued against the divine right of kings, advocating for a system where power derived from the consent and will of the people.

The concept of divine right of kings played a pivotal role in the legitimacy of rulers, shaping the perception of their authority among the populace.

The doctrine of the divine right of kings fostered a belief in the monarch's inherent right to rule, often unchallenged by the governed.

The divine right of kings, rooted in the idea of divine sanction, clashed with emerging secular philosophies challenging the authority of rulers.

The belief in the divine right of kings was ingrained in the political ideologies of the time, justifying hierarchical power structures.

The doctrine of the divine right of kings influenced the perception of monarchy, portraying rulers as bestowed with divine authority.