Sentences with Death Sentence

In some countries, a death sentence is still considered an appropriate punishment for certain crimes.

The concept of a death sentence raises ethical concerns in the modern judicial system.

A death sentence was handed down to the notorious criminal, sparking protests outside the courthouse.

The abolition of the death sentence remains a contentious issue in political discussions.

During the trial, the defense lawyer fought vehemently against the imposition of a death sentence.

The jury's unanimous decision led to the imposition of a death sentence on the defendant.

Despite numerous appeals, the convict could not escape the inevitable death sentence.

The death sentence, once a common punishment, has been abolished in many progressive societies.

Advocates for human rights continually push for the abolition of the death sentence worldwide.

The debate over whether the death sentence serves as an effective deterrent to crime persists in criminology circles.

Some argue that the imposition of a death sentence violates the fundamental right to life.

International law increasingly condemns the use of the death sentence as a form of punishment.

Media coverage of the trial focused heavily on the possibility of a death sentence for the accused.

Families of the victims often seek closure through the pronouncement of a death sentence for the perpetrator.

The controversial decision to commute the death sentence sparked intense public debate.

Proponents of the death sentence argue that it serves as a just retribution for heinous crimes.

The Supreme Court's ruling overturned the state's imposition of a death sentence, citing procedural errors.

The question of mental competence often arises in cases where a death sentence is being considered.

Despite efforts to eliminate it, the death sentence remains part of the legal framework in some regions.

The imposition of a death sentence requires careful consideration of constitutional rights.

Controversy surrounds the use of certain drugs in carrying out a death sentence via lethal injection.

The possibility of an innocent person receiving a death sentence highlights flaws in the justice system.

Humanitarian organizations work tirelessly to advocate for the abolishment of the death sentence worldwide.

The debate over whether the death sentence should be allowed for crimes other than murder remains ongoing.

Public opinion on the death sentence varies widely based on cultural and societal values.

The introduction of life imprisonment as an alternative to the death sentence led to significant legal reforms.

The use of the death sentence as a political tool to silence dissent is a grave violation of human rights.

The decision to commute the death sentence to life imprisonment brought relief to the convict's family.

The judicial system's reliance on the death sentence raises questions about the effectiveness of rehabilitation.

The imposition of a death sentence often brings closure to families affected by heinous crimes.

International treaties strive to establish a global consensus against the imposition of the death sentence.

The execution method chosen for a death sentence is a subject of ethical scrutiny and debate.

The legal battle to appeal a death sentence can be prolonged and emotionally draining for all involved parties.

The death sentence, despite its contentious nature, persists in some legal systems as a means of justice.

Discussions about the death sentence often spark intense emotions and polarized opinions among the public.