Sentences with Libel

The celebrity filed a lawsuit against the magazine for spreading false libel about their personal life.

Despite being proven false, the libelous statement tarnished the scientist's reputation in the academic community.

The company faced legal repercussions after a competitor accused them of libel in their advertising campaign.

The court ruled in favor of the journalist, stating that the article did not constitute libel against the public figure.

The online forum had to remove the post containing libelous content about a local business owner.

The author was sued for libel after including defamatory statements about a real person in their novel.

The heated argument escalated when one participant resorted to using libel against the other's character.

The newspaper published a false article, claiming the politician had committed a crime, leading to a libel lawsuit.

Despite the warning, the gossip magazine continued to libel the celebrity by spreading unfounded rumors about their personal life.

The student faced disciplinary action after attempting to libel a classmate by spreading false information about their academic achievements.

The company sued its competitor for attempting to libel their brand with baseless accusations of product contamination.

The online forum was flooded with libelous comments, damaging the reputation of the small business owner without any evidence.

The courtroom drama unfolded as the lawyer presented evidence to prove that the plaintiff had intentionally tried to libel the defendant.

In the heated political campaign, both candidates accused each other of attempting to libel their character through negative advertising.

The author decided to sue the critic for attempting to libel their latest book, claiming the review contained false and damaging statements.

The bitter ex-spouse resorted to social media to libel their former partner with false accusations, causing emotional distress.

The investigative journalist faced legal consequences after attempting to libel a prominent business figure with unverified claims of corruption.

The libelous accusations against the community organizer caused a rift within the neighborhood.

The journalist faced legal action for writing a libelous article that damaged the reputation of a local business.

The court dismissed the libel case, citing insufficient evidence to prove malicious intent.

The libel lawsuit brought attention to the importance of fact-checking in today's fast-paced news industry.

The political candidate was determined to clear their name after being targeted by a campaign of libel.

The author's attempt to use fiction as a guise for spreading libelous statements led to public outrage.

The libel case sparked a debate about the balance between freedom of speech and protection against false accusations.

The public figure remained resilient in the face of constant libelous attacks from tabloid magazines.

The disgruntled employee sought revenge by creating a fake blog to libel the company and its executives, damaging their professional reputations.

The courtroom was filled with tension as the defense presented evidence to counter the libelous statements made by the prosecution during the trial.

The online community rallied against the individual who tried to libel a charitable organization, accusing them of embezzlement without any proof.

The investigative journalist was praised for exposing corruption without resorting to libelous tactics.

The organization implemented strict guidelines to prevent employees from engaging in libelous activities on social media.

The courtroom drama unfolded as the defendant presented evidence disproving the libelous claims against them.

The libel case served as a cautionary tale for aspiring journalists on the ethical responsibilities of reporting the truth.

The online platform's algorithm flagged and removed content containing potential libel before it could go viral.

The teacher used the libel case as a real-world example to teach students about the impact of false information on reputations.

The public figure decided to take legal action against the persistent campaign of libel aimed at damaging their career.