Sentences with Libel

The courtroom was filled with tension as lawyers presented arguments in the high-profile libel trial.

The journalist faced repercussions for crossing ethical boundaries and engaging in libelous practices to sensationalize the story.

The disgruntled employee's attempt to libel the company on social media backfired when colleagues defended the organization's values and integrity.

The aspiring novelist faced a moral dilemma when asked to include libelous content in their book to create sensationalism and boost sales.

The politician's reputation suffered irreparable damage after a series of libelous accusations circulated on social media.

The libel case prompted a reevaluation of the media outlet's editorial standards and fact-checking procedures.

The celebrity's legal team demanded retractions from news outlets that had published libelous stories about their client.

The community rallied together to condemn the spreading of libelous rumors that targeted a local business owner.

The court imposed hefty fines on the tabloid for repeatedly engaging in libelous reporting with no basis in truth.

The professor emphasized the importance of critical thinking in discerning between factual reporting and libelous content.

The libel lawsuit led to increased public scrutiny of the media's role in shaping public opinion about public figures.

The online platform implemented an AI system to detect and prevent the spread of libelous statements on its platform.

The author faced a backlash from fellow writers for including thinly veiled libelous depictions of real individuals in their novel.

The libelous campaign against the business executive ultimately backfired, with public sympathy turning in their favor.

The international diplomat condemned the use of propaganda to libel their country, urging for fact-based discussions to promote global understanding.

The courtroom drama unfolded as the defense presented evidence to refute attempts to libel the defendant's character through misleading testimony.

The whistleblower faced threats and attempts to libel their credibility after exposing corruption within a powerful government agency.

The libel case sparked a broader conversation about online misinformation and the responsibility of platforms in curbing it.

The court carefully examined each statement to determine if they met the criteria for constituting libel in the defamation case.

The libelous statements in the article were traced back to a disgruntled employee seeking revenge against their former employer.

The libel trial became a high-stakes legal battle with both sides presenting compelling evidence to support their claims.

The court emphasized the importance of distinguishing between protected speech and libel in cases involving public figures.

The media outlet issued a public apology for inadvertently publishing a libelous story without proper fact-checking.